CONNECT NEWSLETTER

Issue Home

 

asset-intertech.com

ScanWorks™

Services

Customer Support

ASSET University

Success Stories

Global Contacts

 

OBSERVATIONS

Test Re-Use: An Idea Whose Time Has Come
by Glenn Woppman
President and CEO

More and more test engineers and manufacturing managers are realizing how far reaching the effects of boundary-scan test re-use can be. And now, with recent new developments, we can truly say that test re-use is a concept whose time has come.

Another article in this issue of Connect describes the new test re-use solutions from ASSET and Agilent Technologies that dispel many of the misconceptions of test re-use. For example, you may have thought that test re-use holds most benefit for high-volume manufacturers that have the luxury of long manufacturing runs and high boundary-scan test content in their designs. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Check out the new solutions and find out why test re-use is now for everyone.

Why Test Re-Use?

Behind the move toward boundary-scan test re-use are some significant economic benefits, but the obvious benefits are just the tip of the iceberg. Most would agree that a large amount of time and money can be saved if tests developed during the design of a product are migrated and re-used by manufacturing and, later, field service. Rather than re-inventing the wheel, so to speak, during each phase of a product’s life cycle, the same boundary-scan tests developed during the design phase can be re-used, eliminating the need to develop them all over again. The cost savings from this kind of a process are rather apparent.

But there are other benefits from test re-use lurking below the surface, although they may be harder to quantify.

For example, how do you economically quantify time-to-market? That’s been a question experts have grappled with for years. Even though it’s tough to put a dollar figure on time-to-market, it’s rather obvious that test re-use will only shorten the time it takes to get a fully tested and fully supported product to market. Removing from the product’s critical path the time it would have taken manufacturing and field service to develop tests significantly shortens a product’s road to the marketplace.

The Momentum of Cost Savings

As cost savings from boundary-scan test re-use begin to mount and the value of an accelerated time-to-market is realized, manufacturers often start thinking about increasing the amount of boundary-scan test coverage in their products in order to keep this momentum going. When this happens, even greater efficiencies can be achieved.

For example, as boundary-scan test coverage increases on a printed circuit board (PCB) or assembly, test probes can be eliminated from the in-circuit test (ICT) fixtures that are used to test the board or assembly on an ICT system like the Agilent 3070. And the savings can be substantial for every probe eliminated from an ICT fixture. Tellabs, for example, estimated saving anywhere from $40,000 to $60,000 per fixture by reducing the number of probes on their fixtures. (For a customer success story on Tellabs’ experience with ScanWorks and how it helped reduced the cost of ICT test fixtures, click here.) Moreover, reducing the number of test probes on a fixture cuts the time it takes to produce the fixture, further shortening the product’s time-to-market.

The time saved by re-using tests could also be applied in other ways to improve the quality of the product. This would reduce the cost of warranty returns as well as support services. Before tests from development are re-used in manufacturing, they might be fine tuned to achieve even greater test coverage. This would also improve the quality of the manufactured product and reduce follow-on costs.

Of course, closely monitoring the results of boundary scan tests in manufacturing can reveal certain trends that can also lead to cost reductions. For example, if a design consistently fails a certain test more often than any other, the order that the tests are applied to that design might be altered so that the test which generates the frequent failure is applied first. This might eliminate time applying other tests if the design is more likely to fail one test over others. The next logical step would be for engineers to devote special attention to identifying the cause of failure to rectify the problem all together.

Achieving Higher Order Test Efficiencies

Once an organization begins to grasp the potential boundary-scan test re-use has for reducing costs and improving efficiencies, it likely will want to achieve higher levels of boundary-scan test coverage in its designs as a means of ratcheting up its efficiencies further. In a sense, a closed loop process develops. That is, test re-use leads to greater efficiencies, which lead to greater boundary-scan test coverage as a way of increasing test re-use. The result is that boundary-scan test re-use increases along with boundary-scan test coverage.

After this self-perpetuating process has run its course for some time, the organization will begin to analyze how it can make the process itself more efficient, reducing test costs further and shortening time-to-market again. The first place where greater efficiencies can be achieved would be during the initial development of tests by the design department. If the organization’s time-to-test, or the time it takes to develop a boundary-scan test for a certain design, can be shortened, the cost-of-test and time-to-market will be slashed as well.

This is just what ASSET has done with TopCAT (Topology and Cluster Analysis Technology) for ScanWorks. To cut time-to-test, TopCAT begins by analyzing the schematic of a PCB to identify all of the non-boundary scan devices that are connected to boundary scan devices. These non-boundary scan devices are candidates for boundary scan cluster tests. Next, TopCAT automatically matches the names of the non-boundary scan devices in the design's netlist with device models archived on ASSET's web site or stored in a model library within the user organization. Once the device models have been retrieved by ScanWorks' TopCAT technology, they are automatically included in the interconnect test generation process. Lastly, TopCAT optimizes the configuration of the device models in a test action for the highest test coverage and to ensure the safety of the board. (For a technical article in a previous issue of Connect by ASSET’s chief technology officer on device modeling, click here.)

Benchmarks have been performed with ScanWorks’ TopCAT technology on a complex printed circuit board (PCB) consisting of almost 9,000 nets, over 40,000 solder joints, approximately 6,000 components including more than 60 non-boundary-scan memory clusters and over 40 non-boundary-scan logic clusters. The results of the benchmarks showed that boundary-scan test development time could be reduced to less than a day while achieving very high test coverage. Previous to TopCAT, a suite of boundary-scan tests for such a design could have taken weeks to develop.

For more information on TopCAT, click here.

The Time for Re-Use Is Now!

Test re-use points to a critical issue for electronics manufacturers. That is, once you start going down the boundary-scan road, you’ll have many opportunities to reduce your overall test costs, achieve higher operational efficiencies and cut the time-to-market for your products. And that’s not a bad proposition at all.